This article was prepared by staff writers in collaboration with outside contributors.
|
While most people are inclined to roll their eyes
upward at the mere mention of studying solar neutrinos, the Sudbury Neutrino
Observatory has its detector more than a mile below the Earth's surface.
The depth protects it from the noise of background radiation. Designing
and building the neutrino detector was no easy task because it relies
on an acrylic sphere four stories high to hold 1,000 metric tons of heavy
water. The heavy water, worth about $300 million (Canadian), is a key
to detecting neutrinos. It is on loan from Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.
It was impossible to perform complete physical tests on the vessel, given
its size and location. Consequently, the builder responsible for the acrylic
vessel, Reynolds Polymer Technology Inc., commissioned William Jones,
director of the MSC.Software Expert Solutions Group in Santa Ana, Calif.,
to provide a simulation study for optimizing the design.
Neutrinos are one of the fundamental building blocks of nature and a cornerstone
of the standard theory of elementary particles. Three types are known
to exist: the electron neutrino, the muon neutrino, and the tau neutrino.
Electron neutrinos are emitted in vast numbers by the nuclear reactions
that energize the sun. They are notoriously hard to detect and require
the use of massive, sophisticated devices such as the Sudbury detector.
The neutrino detector was built to help resolve a 30-year-old mystery
regarding the nature of neutrinos: Why do physicists see only one-third
the number of neutrinos from the sun that is predicted by current theories?
Initial data provided by the Sudbury observatory reveal new and important
properties of neutrinos, and carry implications for a fuller understanding
of the universe.
At
the heart of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, an acrylic vessel holds
more than 2 million pounds of heavy water.
The neutrino detector identifies the interaction between a solar neutrino
and a molecule of heavy water inside the acrylic vessel. According to
Eugene Beier, a professor of physics at the University of Pennsylvania,
the neutrino reacts specifically with the neutron in the nucleus of the
deuterium in the heavy water. Common hydrogen, as found in light water,
contains no neutron.
Each interaction releases a burst of light and waiting to record it is
an array of almost 10,000 photomultiplier tubes. The tubes, mounted on
a geodesic sphere surrounding the vessel, are light detectors that can
sense a single photon.
Photons interact with a thin film inside the tube to eject an electron.
This electron in turn strikes high-voltage plates to cause a cascade of
electrons producing a pulse, which is directed to data recorders.
Although trillions of neutrinos pass through the vessel, only about 20
interactions with the heavy water in the sphere are expected to occur
each day.
The neutrino detector includes a 40-foot-diameter acrylic sphere 2.2 inches
thick with a 25-foot-tall, 6-foot-diameter chimney for filling and draining.
The sphere is made of 120 rectangular panels that are curved by thermo-forming
and machined to a tolerance within 0.005 inch. As far as the people involved
with the detector have been able to learn, the sphere is the largest structure
ever made entirely from acrylic.
The acrylic vessel containing more than 2 million pounds of D2O
is suspended in ultrapure light water, a refinement of the familiar H2O,
in a rock chamber 6,800 feet below ground level in the Creighton nickel
mine operated by Inco Ltd. near Sudbury, Ontario. The light water helps
balance the pressure from within the sphere.
Because extremely low radiation background levels are required to detect
the neutrino reactions, the entire detector is constructed from materials
selected for their low radioactivity content. The acrylic material had
to be very pure, since trace impurities could be a source of radioactive
particles, which would create false readings.
"The basic design issue was to keep the walls of the acrylic vessel
thin enough for the photomultiplier tubes to sense the light resulting
from neutrino interactions, while ensuring that the vessel did not fail,
causing the heavy water to commingle with the light water," Jones
said. "The thinner we made the walls, the more transparent it was
and the less contamination the vessel contained, which minimized radioactive
material. All these things were driving us to thinner walls. We were working
under the most extreme of conditions to make the vessel work, while satisfying
safety requirements and securing the heavy water."
Stress
analysis and other testing by MSC.Software helped shape the final design
of the plastic vessel. The sphere is anchored by tethers at its equator
and rests suspended in light water.
The main objective of the analysis was to determine if the structure
would maintain integrity when filled with its load of heavy water, which
Jones for his analysis calculated at 2.3 million pounds. The sphere is
supported by 10 pairs of polymer ropes attached to its middle ring of
panels. The analysis of the sphere was conducted in three stepsÑa
scoping study that broadly defined the optimum design, a high discontinuity
stress study, and a seismic loading analysis.
Although the tensile strength of the acrylic is quite high, in the vicinity
of 10,000 psi, the allowable stress for this material is very low. An
allowable stress in tension of 580 psi was used for the parent material
to preclude long-term crazing. Crazing, a phenomenon that occurs in acrylic
materials, is characterized by the formation of extremely small surface
cracks, which can eventually reduce the transparency of the material or
cause it to fail.
To reduce the tensile stress in the sphere, the vessel was underfilled
with heavy water, a condition that actually produced a state of compression
because the outside pressure of the light water was greater than that
of the D2O inside.
However, the acceptable amount of compressive stress is also quite low
because the sphere's very large ratio of diameter to thickness (40 feet
to 2.2 inches, or more than 200:1) raises the possibility of buckling.
The final design balances tensile stress and compressive stress to achieve
the largest margin of safety possible, while minimizing the wall thickness.
For the scoping study, a relatively simple finite element model was developed
with 2-D shell elements, enabling the evaluation of a number of variations
to the basic design. A true optimization study was run using the 2-D axisymmetric
shell element, in which a set of design values minimizing the volume of
acrylic in the sphere was automatically selected. "The spherical
shape was selected because it provided the least amount of surface area
required to bound a given volume," Jones, an ASME fellow, said. "This
minimized the amount of acrylic material necessary to contain the D2O,
which reduced foreign materials and therefore background radiation."
The
acrylic vessel at Sudbury, which was designed and built by Reynolds Polymer,
was dry-fit on the surface first, then assembled using a new bonding process
at a depth of 6,800 feet underground.
Stresses in the acrylic material were minimized by floating the vessel
in ultrapure H2O. The spherical shape was also ideal for reducing
the material stresses from internal pressure. How-ever, because D2O
is about 11 percent heavier than the H2O providing the buoyant
force, the membrane stresses in the vessel were not completely eliminated
at all elevations in the sphere.
After determining the optimum design with the shell model, the next step
needed a more detailed representation of the sphere constructed with a
2-D axisymmetric solid element. This technique provided a representation
of the intersection of the sphere and chimney, including local fillet
radii and tapers from the thicker T section down the nominal 2-inch-thick
spherical shell, which makes up most of the sphere.
This model was used to investigate areas of high discontinuity stress,
as well as to evaluate small design changes for reducing the calculated
stress to the allowable material. Once the final details of the sphere/chimney
intersection were determined, a series of runs calculated the effects
of changing water level to investigate the sensitivity of the design to
filling the sphere and cavity initially. Jones also calculated the stress
distribution in the sphere when completely dry and hanging under its own
weight and the reaction loads.
The maximum stress levels in the sphere were determined to be relatively
insensitive to variations of water levels. The filling procedure producing
the lowest stresses on the vessel, as it went from empty to full, was
determined by assuming a series of D2O levels, while finding
the level of H2O that produced the least stress in the vessel.
"Balancing the amount of heavy water in the vessel with light water
in the cavity was a critical aspect of ensuring the integrity of the vessel,"
Jones said. "Our analysis indicated that if both heavy and light
water levels were matched, stress levels during filling would be well
below the allowable short-term stresses of the acrylic material and that
filling would not present a problem."
An
eye to catch the invisible: The completed acrylic vessel with its phototdetector
tube array in place is designed to interact with solar neutrinos passing
through Earth and to record each event.
The third step was a seismic loading analysis, which was based on a seismic
acceleration caused by blasting operations and rock burst phenomena, which
are endemic to deep mines such as this. The analysis used a time history
trace of a typical rock burst or blast measured in the mine. A detailed
finite element model simulated the spherical shell and the light and heavy
water.
Jones conducted a transient dynamic analysis of the induced pressure wave
to calculate the stresses in the acrylic sphere. He compared these results
with the short-term stress limits of the acrylic material.
In addition to the axisymmetric analyses, detailed three-dimensional models
of the vessel were developed that included the thickened equator section
and the fittings for the tethers. The analyses were reviewed by numerous
agencies for completeness and accuracy. Reviewers included the Los Alamos
National Laboratory in Los Alamos, N.M.; Carleton University in Ottawa,
and the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory design team led by Robert Brewer
of Agra-Monenco Ltd., a unit of Agra Inc. of Oakville, Ontario. Members
of the Physics Department at Oxford University independently carried out
pressure time history calculations.
Before
the four-story-high container was built 2 km below ground, test calculations
included resistance to seismic disturbance, crazing, and buckling.
Finally, a series of buckling analyses were done showing that the vessel
would hold up under applied loads. Because the pressure inside the sphere
increases more rapidly with depth than the pressure in the water, a net
differential pressure across the sphere wall is always present. With a
very high radius-to-thickness ratio, buckling of the sphere had to be
considered as a possible failure mode. Jones said, "The pressure
distribution on the vessel is quite complex because of the difference
in density between the D2O and H2O, the geometry
of the vessel, and the low differential water levels used to minimize
stresses on the vessel."
Once the component panels of the observatory's acrylic vessel were built,
each had to be cleaned and individually packaged for shipment to the mine.
The entire laboratory site located at the 6,800-foot level of the mine
is operated as a level 2000 cleanroom, making assembly and bonding more
difficult.
Proper assembly of the vessel required tight tolerances of less than an
inch over the 40-foot structure, no mine dust in the bonding syrup, and
a new bonding process. According to David Duff, vice president of Reynolds
Polymer in Grand Junction, Colo., "The assembly was dry fit and documented
before shipping it to the bottom of the mine. We used a theodolite system
that triangulates with infrared light to any point relative to any other
point with submillimeter accuracy to determine exactly where panels had
to be positioned in relation to each other."
Bonding Accuracy Is Vital
Bonding structural acrylic panels together is not like gluing a model
together; it's more of a casting process so the light doesn't reflect
off the bonds. The curing rate is important because air bubbles can get
trapped in the bonding syrup if it hardens too quickly. With a tolerance
on the bond gap of an eighth to a sixteenth of an inch, particularly when
applied to a 40-foot-diameter sphere, the accuracy of the bonding process
is critical.
"With conventional bonding, heat is used to cure the bond,"
said Duff, an ASME member. Heat distorts the bonds and can cause them
to shift. "We developed a new room temperature curing process that
cured the entire bond gap at the same time, producing linear shrinkage,"
he added. "This allowed us to control panel movement."
To visualize the assembly of the detector vessel, think of an igloo. A
platform that moved inside the cavity was used to assemble the vessel.
First, the chimney was positioned on the platform and bonded together.
The finished chimney was then hoisted out of the way and suspended from
the cavity's ceiling. Next, the 10 panels of the equatorial row were positioned
on the platform and bonded together. Then each row above it was positioned
and bonded, until the top row was bonded to the chimney.
Special Vectran ropes were then inserted into grooves in the 10 panels
of the middle row specially machined to hold them. The structure was put
into position and the whole upper hemisphere was suspended. The construction
platform was then progressively lowered as the lower rows were positioned
and bonded to the upper hemisphere.
"Even with all the special handling, in one area there was some contamination
in the bonding syrup," Duff said. "Because the light emitted
off this point, it actually was a positive, since it provides a zero point."
As a result of the successful assembly and subsequent two years of reliable
operation of the Sudbury neutrino detector, scientists were able to report
last June that electron neutrinos from the sun transform into neutrinos
of other types during their flight to Earth. According to Art McDonald
of Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, who is director of the Sudbury
project, the data, combined with results of earlier experiments conducted
in Japan, have important implications for ideas about energy and matter.
One implication is that current theories concerning energy generation
in the core of the sun are substantially correct, he said. The information
on neutrino properties will be very valuable in extending the present
Standard Model of Elementary Particles, which currently assumes that neutrinos
do not transform their type. The information obtained on neutrino mass
contributes to determining the influence of neutrinos produced in the
original Big Bang on the evolution of the universe.
sidebar: new detector
to monitor neutrinos
home
| features | news
update | marketplace
| departments | about
ME | back issues |
ASME | site
search
© 2002 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
|