by Ronald
A.L.
Rorrer |
My boss at a company once asked
me how it was that every Ph.D. interviewed could be rated in the top 10
percent by a dissertation advisor. Obviously, they are from the University
of Lake Woebegone, where all the students are above average.
How does one decide among candidates? Often, hiring becomes a leap of
faith, and you hope that you have somehow perceived that this candidate
will at least show up to work (occasionally, on time), not just stare
at the clock for eight hours, and certainly not go on a killing spree
after the first annual review.
Let's start with the first thing that companies say they want from
graduating seniors. Typically, it is playing well with others, or teamwork.
The other individual traits that lead to success as an engineer in the
corporate world, in order of importance, are oral communication, written
communication, and technical ability.
When you look to hire an entry-level engineer graduating with a bachelor's
degree for a technical position, you need look no farther than the senior
design report.
The senior design project is also known as the capstone design sequence.
In a wall, the capstone is the top course, which ties the other stones
together. The capstone design sequence is intended to tie together the
undergraduate experience. Because the course sequence is similar to an
industrial project, it can be an indicator of performance in industry.
Ask the candidate to bring along either the final report for the year
or the reports from each semester. If the candidate cannot find the report
or seems hesitant to bring it, do you need to know any more? It was not
a good job. Or, the candidate is completely disorganized, or was not instrumental
in the project and never had a copy.
If you are going to be the manager of this employee, you meet the candidate
early in the morning, send him or her on to the other interviewers, and
look at the report.
First, you flip through it. With rare exceptions, if it looks good, it
is good. This is the most important 10 minutes that you can spend evaluating
a candidate.
Students have the opportunity today to work on fabulous projects. Virtually
every engineering society has a project suitable for senior design. If
these projects or others like them do not excite students, they are not
going to be real mechanical engineers. If they didn't work on the
ASME human-powered vehicle, SAE Mini-Baja, or Formula SAE, they should
have worked on something requiring similar engineering interest and effort.
You read the abstract, look at the assembly drawing of the project, and
then read the conclusion and recommendations. Perhaps you read sections
of the report.
This tells you whether or not the candidate's team produced a good
piece of work. Your task at the end of the day will be to determine the
contribution made by the individual you are interviewing.
Your questions can be directly in reference to the report. For example,
ask: "What was your role on the team?" Or, "What
part did you have in writing the report?" This one is important.
It is possible not to be involved in the writing. Some students will only
do CAD drawings, others machining, etc.
What is different about this from the normal interviewing process? It
is evaluation of the written communication. A much deeper understanding
of a technical topic is demonstrated when one can write about it. It's
not just that it is difficult to write, but to write takes more understanding
of a subject than is required to talk about it.
When discussing projects with students, I will feel that they understand
the technical aspects of the work. However, when I read the design reports,
I invariably find that students understand less than I thought they did.
If you want to really see how a new mechanical engineering graduate works
in a team and how one will communicate technical information, the yearlong
internship has already been accomplished for you. All you need to do is
tap the treasure chest of the senior design report.
Ronald A.L. Rorrer is an assistant professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado at Denver.
home
| features | news
update | marketplace
| departments | about
ME | back issues |
ASME | site
search
© 2003 by The American Society
of Mechanical Engineers
|