| This
article was prepared by staff writers in collaboration with outside contributors.
|
from
its inception, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter was to be a single aircraft
platform for deployment by the U.S. Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps.
But the services' different missions required variants of the F-35
airframe and structure.
The Air Force needed a tough, lightweight aircraft that could operate
from fields close to combat zones. This is the conventional takeoff and
landing variant.
The Marines needed a plane with short takeoff and vertical landing. This
aircraft, which has a 50-inch-diameter lift-fan behind its cockpit powered
by the F-35's turbine engine, has also been ordered by Britain's
Royal Navy and Royal Air Force.
The U.S. Navy required an aircraft carrier version of the F-35, with larger
wings and control surfaces, and a beefier, more rugged airframe to serve
on carriers.
In the past, the services would have bought different airplanes, each
running up hundreds of millions in one-time costs. One design to suit
the three services had appeal, but it also presented engineering challenges.
All the plane's hardware, in all its varietyweapons, radars,
fuel tanks, electronics, and the restmust be shoehorned into the
fuselage or wings. Nothing can be bolted beneath the wings or attached
to the nose.
The big design issues have been settled. Now, Lockheed Martin, which plans
eventually to build an average of a plane a day, is engineering the assembly
of the F-35.
The company is building the first of 22 pre-production models of the fighter
at a plant in Fort Worth, Texas, where it is studying assembly procedures
so that everything works efficiently when production picks up speed.
 |
| By simulating the assembly of
the Joint Strike Fighter's major components, engineers can forestall
problems on the floor of the plant. |
Manufacturing engineers are using software from Delmia to study simulations
of assembly processes. Delmia, based in Auburn Hills, Mich., is a unit
of Dassault Systèmes, whose Catia software is the CAD system that
Lockheed Martin uses.
According to Kevin Albers, the manufacturing engineer who manages the
F-35 modeling and simulation efforts at Fort Worth, "All of the
critical assembly sequence operations have been simulated." Completed
simulations include the full assembly sequence for the wing, and the automated
mating of the wing structure with the sections of fuselage.
Assembly of the F-35 at Fort Worth has been highly automated and centers
around three assembly systems. The biggest of them assembles three variants
of wings. Standing about 30 feet high, the assembly systems automatically
accommodate different components. One reason for many simulations was
to engineer optimum ways that components will go into these systems and
the way finished assemblies will be taken out.
Subcontractors and other Lockheed Martin plants are handling most of the
detailed parts fabrication and subassembly. The large aircraft componentslike
fuselage sections and tailsarrive as subassemblies weighing hundreds
or even thousands of pounds. Assembly is simplified (and greatly speeded
up) because the subassemblies arrive at Fort Worth "stuffed"that
is, with nearly all the system components installed.
The plant is a mile long and in many places several hundreds yards wide,
but it's a busy place. Engineers want to be sure ahead of time
that they have allowed the required clearances for moving parts across
the floor collision-free.
According to Albers, "Even for well-planned manufacturing operations,
the simulations reveal some manufacturing issues where you discover a
problem with the assembly order, or that you need a tool to locate a part,
or a platform or stepladder to reach something. We are finding smaller
and smaller problems, which is a good thing. That means the earlier simulations
have already solved the bigger problems."
Lockheed Martin plans to begin low-rate production in 2007 and to build
500 planes before full production starts in 2012.
home
| features | breaking
news | marketplace
| departments | about
ME back issues | ASME
| site search
© 2005 by The American Society
of Mechanical Engineers
|