by Steven
M.
Zychinski |
Most
people probably don't give a second thought to the works of a vending
machine, as long as it accepts their money, returns the correct change,
and gives them what they paid for.
When someone deposits money into a vending machine, the bill acceptor
or coin changer validates it as legal tender and issues credit. Once a
product selection button has been depressed, the control system tells
the machine what product to dispense and tells the coin changer to issue
the correct amount of change.
Coin Acceptors Inc. designs and manufactures vending machines, control
systems, bill acceptors, and coin changers for the snack and beverage
industry. The company, based in St. Louis, sells its products through
branch companies as far away as Europe and Australia.
To improve the industry's machines, the firm set out to offer a
high-capacity coin changer, which would operate a bit differently. It
was during the design of this device that our engineering team at Coin
Acceptors was reminded of an important design principle: No gear operates
alone.
Our explorations to come up with the right design even included a modified
cut of gear teeth to avoid problems of excessive contact.
 |
| Small gear trains (above) rely
on carrier plates about the size of a quarter to maintain alignment.
The plates are secured with center-punched pins (below). |
 |
A coin changer usually has a supply of coins stacked in tubes. The new
design would collect the coins in a hopper, and let a mechanism at the
bottom orient them for payback. It would give the coin changer greater
change-making capacity.
A larger change capacity would improve the productivity of the company's
machines. The more money a coin changer can store and dispense, the more
profit the vending machine can make for its owner, because it can sell
more merchandise between routine service visits.
There were some special considerations in the design. Since a significant
percentage of vending machines are used outdoors, they are subject to
a range of environments. The company sells its machines in countries around
the globe. One machine can be selling sodas on a street in Quito, Ecuador,
almost on the Equator, while another may dispense quick-energy snacks
outside a filling station in Kiruna, Sweden, above the Arctic Circle.
The company determined that, to function reasonably in the extremes, the
system needed to operate at ambient temperatures between -10°F
and 160°F. Due to the nature of the coin changer's dispensing
mechanism, it had to output a large amount of torque with limited available
power, and had to be rugged enough to reverse out of hard stops 10 percent
of the time in the course of its lifetime.
The stops were a consideration because of the hopper system of storing
coins. The sorting mechanism included an auger system that oriented the
coins. Sometimes there would be a blockage of coins in the hopper. The
auger was designed to persist for a fraction of a second when it met a
blockage. Then it would reverse itself and restart.
When the coins fell in line, the mechanism would dispense a coin every
half second until the total sum of change was delivered. If there was
a blockage, the coins might take a full second each to drop.
The engineering team at Coin Acceptors decided to outsource the drive
system design to a contractor.
Because the coin changer had to fit existing machines, its exterior dimensions
were already settled at approximately 14.5 inches in height, 5.5 inches
in width, and 3.0 inches in depth. The motor selected by the contractor
left less than a half-inch of height available for the gear train, so
a fixed differential epicyclic drive train was selected for its robustness
and reduction capability within the allotted package size.
Lubricant was used to reduce heat buildup and increase the efficiency
of the system. The drive train's planet gear carrier was an assembled
steel structure to maintain gear alignment. All gears were injection molded
out of unfilled acetal plastic, except the sun gear, which needed the
increased strength of C36000 brass. Injection-molded plastic gearing offered
more design freedom, quieter system operation, and lower cost.
What
We Like to Call 'Challenges'
We subjected the first prototypes to stringent testing from -10°F
and 160°F. To say they displayed poor performance is an understatement.
Low output torque coupled with drive system lockups plagued early test
efforts. It turned out that every component contributed to the shortcomings
of the system. The motor was noisy and weak, the lubricant hampered the
system at low temperatures, the carrier deformed, and the gears were misshapen
and suffered backlash that increased with the heat.
With the production date for our coin changer looming, we needed to come
up with solutions fast. The company decided to bring the design in-house.
Since there was a hefty investment already made in tooling, inspection
equipment, and assembly fixturing, using any of the existing hardware
would be beneficial.
We started with the motor, since a gear train is only as good as the component
that drives it. The 12-volt dc motor squeaked and drew more than twice
the current we had expected under no-load conditions at -10°F.
The internal bushing of the motor was causing additional loads as the
ambient temperature dropped.
We found another model from Mabuchi Motor Co., which has a U.S. office
in Troy, Mich. The motor has better performance characteristics throughout
our temperature range, and within the same package size. It can output
40 grams-centimeters of torque at 9,000 rpm with 4 watts of power.
 |
| The coin changer will serve to
keep exchanges in order in machines like this demonstration model.
The gears must work everywhere, from the Equator to the Arctic. |
|
|
Because the original lubricant was a high-viscosity hydraulic and circulating
oil, we expected a slight reduction in drive system torque at -10°F,
but actually lost more than 50 percent. Since the drive system operates
intermittently, as it sorts coins only when change needs to be made, starting
torque rating for the lubricant is crucial. The lubricant was actually
decreasing the efficiency of the system.
We replaced it with a light-viscosity, synthetic hydrocarbon grease made
by Nye Lubricants, which is based in Fairhaven, Mass. Efficiency loss
of the system at -10°F due to the lubricant dropped to 5 percent.
Since the drive system is not sealed, the grease seemed to stay with the
gear teeth longer than the oil had done, giving the added benefit of extended
life.
The planet carrier originally was assembled by press fitting steel pins
into steel plates to form a rugged structure for maintaining gear alignment
during a hard stop. The steel pins gave the planet gears a smooth bearing
surface to rotate about and the steel plates were supposed to keep everything
aligned.
When we tested them, the carrier plates separated from the pins and compromised
gear alignment. Stress calculations along with focused testing confirmed
that the plates were not thick enough and would not be able to handle
the required loads.
Since increasing the plate thicknesses was not practical, a secondary
operation was added to the assembly fixturing for a minimal tooling charge.
Center punching the pins achieved the maximum holding force through a
riveting effect and increased the rigidity by 50 percent. This allowed
us to use existing plate and pin components.
Then there was the gear train and its array of errors in both design
and processing. The design offered poor load transference with low contact
ratio and excessive backlash, which grew worse as temperatures rose. It
was clear the gear train, as designed, would not be usable in our specified
temperature range. Combine that with the lack of adequate bearing support
to maintain center distances and the runout associated with low-quality
gearing, and you get a recipe for tooth wear and fracture, and ultimately
drive system lockup.
Load analysis suggested a benefit from a material change for the ring
gears. We chose a reinforced nylon from Ticona of Summit, N.J. The material
offers more strength without increasing wear. It also has a reduced coefficient
of thermal expansion, which meant 25 percent less fluctuation in backlash
and contact ratio throughout the wide operating temperature range.
|
|
|
|
| Undercutting planet teeth avoided
problems, including high wear, that would come from too much contact
below involute. |
Inspection information confirmed that we had a quality issue with the
ring gears. Their oblong shape, due to irregular shrinkage, was evident
in the amount of runout measured. Higher-precision tooling was built and
we took this opportunity to design the components to be more symmetrical,
to obtain uniform shrink after being ejected from the mold. The new material
was also beneficial here, since its mold shrinkage characteristics are
75 percent less than those of the original material.
You can have gears of the highest quality, but if alignment isn't
maintained, there will be problems. We optimized all bearing supports
and all but eliminated any loading applied directly to the motor shaft.
This shifted the contact surfaces to the components with the highest output
of torque.
As for the gear profiles, there were two schools of thought about allowing
operation throughout the temperature range while using the existing carrier
center distances.
The more conventional method meant increasing the diametral pitches of
each gear. Adjustments in tooth thicknesses and heights would increase
the contact ratios and reduce backlash, but we feared that the finer teeth
of the ring gears wouldn't be able to withstand the hard stop requirement
of the drive system, especially at 160°F. In addition, new inspection
equipment would be needed from the diametral pitch change, and we were
not very excited about spending that time and money.
We
Can Do That?
We chose a more progressive method, and stuck with the original diametral
pitches of each gear.
Adjustments in tooth thicknesses and heights increased the contact ratios
and reduced the backlash between the gear sets, but allowed teeth on the
ring gears that were thick enough to withstand the hard stop requirement
of the drive system. It was necessary to alter the profile to avoid contact
below the involute, which would cause high wear, high heat generation,
low efficiency, non-conjugate motion, and noise. So we undercut the planet
teeth. Now, no matter how much the gears expanded or contracted throughout
the temperature range, they would still be maintaining adequate contact
ratios.
Output torque of the drive system at temperatures between -10°F and
160°F proved to be at the specification. Life testing of the drive
system at the full range of temperatures proved the hard stop performance
to be 33 percent above the specification, or four lifetimes of the coin
changer.
With these results, our coin changer was able to meet its production date.
Coin Acceptors introduced the finished product to the market in August
last year.
The challenges that we faced with our drive system are not uncommon ones.
However, the way you face the challenges makes the difference. We always
have to keep in mind that a system is made up of more than just gears.
Steven M. Zychinski is a senior engineer at Coin
Acceptors Inc. in St. Louis.
home
| features | news
update | marketplace
| departments | about
ME | back issues |
ASME | site
search
© 2004 by The American Society
of Mechanical Engineers
|