by Paul
Sharke,
Associate Editor |
You've been accosted by
them yourself, those electric vehicles that ferry folks around the airports.
The honk that grows louder from behind as you lug your baggage through
the terminal means only one thing: Clear the way or risk certain flattening.
Pedestrians don't have much of a chance any more. Even in New York
City, where walkers outnumber vehicles many times over, it's a
regular event for auto traffic to blow through red lights or try to push
through a crowd as the great mass of foot traffic begins constricting
the street from both sides.
More sense prevails in the controlled environment of a U.S. Postal Service
processing facility in Fort Myers, Fla. There, at least, pedestrians are
granted their rightful way.
The heavily automated facility is a test case for the post office's
experiment in integrated mail processing.
YOUR MANNERS ARE SHOWING
According to Roger McLarry, an operations support specialist at the Fort
Myers facility, the twin automated forklifts and lone "tugger"
the postal service installed there several years ago are quite polite.
They move at a walking pace, he said, and never fail to yield to people
or objects in the way. They emit visual and audible warnings as they travel
through the place.
The 41-bay facility handles both letters and flat mail from about that
many post offices, encompassing 88 ZIP codes, McLarry said. Although several
processing facilities within the postal system incorporate tray management
systems, the Fort Myers facility is unique as the test site for the Universal
Transport System. This system handles sacks, parcels, and trays for letters
and flat mail, which are fully compatible with the range of automatic
processes at the facility.
One
of two automated forklifts at the Fort Myers processing operation drags
an empty wire container behind it. This carrier typifies the several varieties
of mail con-tainers in the facility.
The automated guided vehicles, or AGVs, move pallets and wheeled containers
between the sorting equipment and the loading dock, McLarry said. That
consigns manned forklifts and towmotors to the dock and away from the
sorting machinery and workers inside, he added.
To find their way, the three vehicles from AGV Products Inc. of Charlotte,
N.C., rely on laser guidance, wall-mounted reflectors, and a PC-based
controller running the company's routing software.
The vehicles follow a route through the building, but can also be summoned
by employees. A vision system observes the floor from overhead. When full
pallets are placed over ground markings, the vision system alerts the
AGVs of waiting loads after detecting a change in contrast.
According to AGV Products' Darin Boik, who managed the Fort Myers
project, laser-guided AGVs have been around for about a decade, having
practically supplanted wire-guided installations, which dominated for
many years, as well as the shorter-lived inertial systems that followed.
He expects that future AGVs will be able to key into local positioning
systemsthe indoor equivalent of the global positioning systemespecially
if the accuracy of the fledgling technology improves as expected.
REFLECTING WELL ON AGVs
For the Fort Myers AGV project, personnel installed a grid of reflectors
in the building. The vehicles, bouncing laser light off these reflectors,
triangulate their x-y coordinates and their headings. A confidence factor
helps the vehicle place either more faith or less in its knowing where
it is, thereby accounting, say, for variations in a scan off a dirty reflector.
Increasing plant safety by eliminating the driver in forklift operations
is an attractive benefit of AGV systems, though by no means the biggest
draw, Boik said. That honor goes to reducing labor costs, he explained.
Still, AGVs don't have to push the limits of plant speed restrictions
or cut corners in order to clock out at 5 p.m. An AGV's very need
to follow instructions makes it a model employee. Three redundant on-board
systems maintain constant survey of the terrain ahead, Boik explained.
Laser scanning, infrared object detection, and plastic bumpers make up
the three systems, serving to slow the vehicle when a field is breached
and to stop it when the field is impinged, he said.
Although Boik was not aware of any U.S. safety standards that specifically
govern AGVs, the safety standard ANSI/ ASME B56.5-1993 (Guided Industrial
Vehicles Automated Functions of Manned Industrial Vehicles) forbids safety
systems from being controlled through software, he said. Instead, electromechanical
systems provide AGVs with a fail-safe means of avoiding people and things.
In addition to systems for preventing collisions, AGVs come fitted with
load monitor systems to avoid overloading or uneven weight distribution,
Boik said. When it comes to load handling, high repeatability has a positive
effect on product damage when compared with manual operations.
Safety was on everybody's mind at the USPS's Processing
and Distribution Center in Brooklyn, N.Y., as that facility began looking
at ways of automating material handling.
Mike Maravas, a technical manager with the post office's engineering
headquarters in Merrifield, Va., recently finished acceptance tests for
an inertia-based prototype system in Brooklyn that operates along 3,000
linear feet of magnetic guide path embedded in the floor. The second phase
of the project may stretch the guide path to over 10,000 feet, he said.
Engineers are evaluating inertia-guided systems and laser-guided systems
for the project's next phase.
KEEPING AISLES CLEAR
Awareness training of its members played a big part in convincing the
union that AGVs at the Brooklyn facility would not bring harm to the personnel
there. Workers are trained to watch for AGVs and to interact with them
safely. They are instructed to keep clear of AGV travel paths whenever
an unmanned vehicle is approaching. An AGV that has stopped due to a path
obstruction will automatically reset after 3 seconds, issue an alarm,
and flash a signal light, before continuing on the way.
That's quite a bit different from the supervisor-required key restarts
of the post office's previous foray into AGVs in the early 1980s,
Maravas said. A dozen test sites along the East Coast proved that the
wire-guided AGVs of the day weren't suited for post office work.
Only two such vehicles from that era are still in operation today.
An
auto-mated towmotor pulls three general purpose containers down an aisle
at the Fort Myers facility.
But workers in Brooklyn are expected to take an active role in their
interactions with the AGVs. For instance, the white plastic skirts that
rise from floor level along the front of the vehicles are not called "bumpers"
but "giant E-stops," Maravas explained, reinforcing the
part facility personnel play in ensuring their own safety.
On the other hand, the AGVs are expected to avoid the workers in every
situation imaginable. A laser scanning curtain was added to the AGVs to
protect against any possible spots unseen by bumpers or infrared devices.
Anyone crossing the curtain stops the AGV.
Local unions were asked for their input and concerns about the AGVs. Adjusting
the system in response to these concerns ensured that the AGVs could travel
safely around the building. The maintenance department helped during the
installation and testing, by pointing out how system operation could be
improved and by consolidating preventive maintenance procedures.
TECHNOLOGY OWNERSHIP IS VITAL
Such ownership of technology plays an important role in its acceptance.
In the old days, an AGV vendor's field tech would have to visit
a plant every time a change was needed in the guide path. Nowadays, with
most if not all AGV manufacturers storing guide paths on AutoCAD software,
changing a route involves only laying it out on the computer and downloading
the changes to the AGVstasks handled routinely by facility personnel.
Coupled with laser guidance and wireless communications, these major advances
by today's AGVs may just make them work for the post office this
time around, Maravas said.
SIDEBAR: Robot Patrol
home |
features |
news update |
marketplace |
departments |
about ME |
back issues |
ASME |
site search
© 2003 by The American Society
of Mechanical Engineers
|