|
by Ahmed K. Noor, Robert Zubrin, and Douglas
Stanley
|
the
investment in space exploration in the last four decades has helped make
life on Earth safer in many ways and richer in all ways. Space age technology
has made possible satellite telecommunications and the Global Positioning
System, and has even improved our weather forecasting.
Activities focused on space will continue to accelerate advances in robotics,
power technologies, and life-support systems. They will enhance our creativity
in finding new solutions for Earth-related problems, and can have significant
impact on society and the economy in unforeseeable ways.
The study of human physiology in space environments can significantly
enhance the understanding of various terrestrial diseases and provide
stimulus for development of innovative medical technology. Smart, integrated
medical systems being developed for space may one day deliver high-level
care to rural clinics, nursing homes, and isolated accident sites.
 |
| Earthly rehearsal: Mars Society
crew members explore Canada's Devon Island, 900 miles from the North
Pole, in a dry run to predict what humans may experience on Mars.
Techniques developed in Earth-based analog environments can serve
as an important means of maximizing the effectiveness of future human
missions to the Red Planet. |
In January 2004, President Bush announced a vision of space exploration
that would return human beings to the moon and eventually send them to
Mars.
The engineering of highly reliable, robust systems for those human space
missions, along with the creation of a livable, artificial environment
on Mars, will provide a new arena for the innovation of future technologies,
allowing scientific progress and creating economic growth. Future decades
may witness industrial commercialization of extraterrestrial resources,
combined with strong international cooperation for the benefit of humankind.
While some of today's technologies might be adequate for human
Mars missions, more advanced technologies could lower the cost, and make
exploration safer and more productive. Finding the resources for these
technologies and deciding the best way to invest them are among the challenges
that engineers and administrators face.
But these and other questions surrounding Mars exploration had been under
study long before the president discussed his vision with the American
people.
Studies of human Mars missions have been conducted in the last two decades
by NASA, other space agencies, and non-government groups, including the
Mars Society. NASA has developed a series of design reference missions
to serve as guideposts toward sending a human crew to Mars and to provide
a basis for comparing different approaches and criteria. NASA's
vision is to combine the knowledge gained from robotic Mars missions and
the experience of human lunar missions to develop a plan to send people
to Mars in the 2025-2030 time frame. A formal assessment of potential
approaches for a human Mars mission will be made by NASA in the coming
year.
 |
| Concepts of a Mars habitat and
rover appear in an image generated by Orange Dot Entertainment for
a documentary film, The Mars Underground, in collaboration with the
Center for Advanced Engineering Environments. |
There are engineering challenges to be met at each stage of the way.
Technology must be developed to transport the infrastructure, facilities,
and crew from Earth to Mars. The infrastructure and facilities themselves
need to be developed. Advanced technology is needed to provide life support
(particularly consumables) to the crew during all phases of the mission,
and to lift the crew from the surface of Mars and transport them back
to Earth.
If space exploration is about venturing to new worlds and understanding
the universe in ever-increasing detail, then both robots and humans are
needed, as key components of an integrated, networked human-robotic exploration
system. The strength of each partner can make up for the other's
weaknesses. This applies specifically to the intelligence and flexibility
of human participation, on the one hand, and the beneficial use of robotic
assistance to amplify human performance, on the other.
There are different strategies for getting to Mars, a few of which require
some assembly of spacecraft in low Earth orbit. Depending upon the mission
architecture adopted, a human Mars mission will require 250 to 500 metric
tons of mass to be delivered to low Earth orbit, which is to say two to
four times the amount required to support a human lunar expedition. Thus,
if a Saturn V class launch vehicle is developed capable of boosting a
lunar mission with a single launch, two to four such missions will be
required to send a crew to Mars. Alternatively, if a decision is made
to launch lunar missions with several medium-lift vehicles, then dozens
of launches might be required to send humans to Mars.
Every launch, however, increases mission risk, because if a single delivery
of critical hardware should fail, the entire mission would be lost. Also,
if the strategy requires extensive assembly in orbit, mission complexity
and risk increase even more. Furthermore, all launches must not only be
successful; they also must be on time. If propulsion stages, for instance,
were held too long in orbit by excessive delays, they could lose cryogenic
propellant, and thus become useless.
The reliability of successful launches achieved historically for American
expendable systems is about 0.9, and the success rate for on-time launch
has been closer to 0.5. In the face of this reality, any mission design
that requires four successful on-time launches, let alone a dozen, is
an open invitation to failure.
The development of heavy-lift launch vehicles in the Saturn V class or
more powerful is thus an essential requirement for a successful moon-Mars
program. Such a vehicle would allow a moon mission to be accomplished
in a single launch, and Mars missions to be done in two to four launches.
The on-time requirement for the Mars launches can be greatly mitigated
by adopting mission strategies in which each booster sends its own payload
directly to Mars independently. The crew leaves Earth only after it has
been confirmed that all the other payloads have arrived on Mars safely.
Such direct injection mission designs also eliminate the need for on-orbit
assembly, and the costly orbital infrastructure required to support it.
Getting There on Less
While a host of space propulsion systems, ranging from solar reflective
light sails to magnetic fusion or even anti-matter, have been proposed
for human missions to Mars, there are really only three viable candidates
for the foreseeable future.
Chemical propulsion has already supported human lunar missions. However,
the exhaust velocity obtainable by such systems is limited. To date, the
best exhaust velocity achieved with chemical engines is 4,440 meters per
second using hydrogen and oxygen propellant. That is close to the theoretical
limit of about 4,700 m/s. Thus, significant further improvement of this
technology appears to be impossible.
Greater exhaust velocity is a desirable goal. A doubling of exhaust velocity
means that an engine would need only half as much propellant to exert
a given amount of impulse, thereby reducing the mass, and thus the cost,
of a mission.
Nuclear thermal rocket engines work by using a solid-core fission reactor
to heat hydrogen propellant, which is passed through the engine block
as a coolant and then ejected from the nozzle to produce thrust. Because
such devices decouple the energy source from the motive mass, they can
achieve significantly higher exhaust velocities than chemical engines.
In a ground test program conducted jointly by NASA and the Atomic Energy
Commission during the 1960s, nuclear thermal rocket engines were fired
with thrust levels ranging from 15,000 to 250,000 pounds, and exhaust
velocities of 8,500 m/s. Limited only by the temperature tolerance of
reactor materials, exhaust velocities for this technology approaching
10,000 m/s appear achievable.
However, as a result of the post-Apollo decisions to terminate research,
space-rated nuclear rocket engines do not exist today. There is little
doubt that this technology could be made to work, but the need to accommodate
a renewed ground test program with today's more radiologically
sensitive political environment poses issues that have yet to be resolved.
 |
| Mars base: NASA estimates that
a human Mars expedition will require the launch of two to four times
the mass needed for a lunar mission. Most of the necessary technology
has yet to be developed. |
There are also electric propulsion systems, which accelerate a charged
propellant via either electrostatic or magnetohydrodynamic means. There
is thus almost no limit to the theoretical exhaust velocity of such technology
and, in fact, exhaust velocities of 50,000 to 100,000 m/s10 to
20 times those of chemical engineshave been demonstrated. The
problem, however, is that electric power must be supplied to drive such
units. This could be done in space using either photovoltaic or nuclear
sources, but the mass of such systems would be considerable, and would
greatly affect performance.
If an electric power source were large enough to reach Mars in six months,
a trip time obtainable with chemical systems, the mass of the mission
would become excessive. If the power system were kept small, the transit
times would grow to years.
If electric propulsion represents an inferior technology for use on piloted
Mars missions, it does, however, offer some interesting potential for
cargo delivery or as a support system. For instance, it could drive a
kind of transport craft to raise cargo payloads to high orbits loosely
bound to the Earth. Once a payload has been so positioned, it can be driven
rapidly to Mars with a relatively small amount of chemical propulsion,
allowing the electric tug to return to low Earth orbit for another load.
In order to achieve Mars orbit insertion and descent to the surface, rather
large accelerations are required, which if implemented via chemical propulsion,
require very large propellant masses. Until now, all Mars orbiting spacecraft
have been captured into orbit using rocket propulsion. It would be highly
advantageous from the point of view of reducing mission mass to accomplish
this orbital capture maneuver using aero braking (and aerocapture friction
against the planet's atmosphere) in place of propellant.
The direct entry technique, which was performed successfully by Mars
Pathfinder and the two Mars exploration rovers, might be acceptable
for delivering cargo to Mars, but is undesirable for human landings, since
it precludes a pause in orbit that might be advisable if bad weather prevails
at the time of arrival.
Aerocapture is a maneuver designed to take advantage of Mars' atmosphere
to slow a spacecraft to orbital capture velocities. A vehicle that enters
orbit in this manner would need to carry less mass in the form of propellant
than a craft relying solely on engines. Aerocapture begins with a shallow
approach angle to the planet. Descent into the relatively dense atmosphere
causes not only sufficient deceleration to enter an orbit, but also sufficient
heating to require a heat shield.
Two strategies have been proposed for returning from Mars. In one, an
Earth return vehicle is placed in Mars orbit, and an ascent vehicle carries
the crew from the Martian surface to a rendezvous with the ERV. The crew
members transfer to the ERV, which returns them to Earth. This strategy
requires minimum lift-off mass from Mars, but it requires two vehicles.
In the other strategy, there is one vehicle, which ascends from the surface
of Mars and returns all the way to Earth. The vehicle must lift the propellants
required for the trip from Mars orbit back to Earth, as well as the capsule
and all consumables and systems for a 180-day journey. Such an approach,
however, may be advantageous if the return propellant can be made on Mars
out of local materials.
Living off the Land
Regardless of the method proposed, technology development is required
in a number of areas. Increasingly lighter-weight structures and materials
must combine with advanced propulsion and power systems, thermal and environmental
control systems, and avionics and communications systems. Equally important
will be technologies that will let the crew make use of resources they
find on Mars.
Throughout history it has been invariably shown that those explorers have
succeeded best who were prepared to make intelligent use of the resources
available in their environment. The Lewis and Clark expedition would have
been impossible had they tried to bring with them all the food and water
necessary for themselves and their horses for a three-year transcontinental
expedition.
When we consider human Mars missions, the case for local resource utilization
becomes still stronger, as the costs and difficulty involved in transporting
necessary materials from Earth are enormous. Not having to deliver fuel,
for instance, could reduce mission mass significantly.
The Martian environment is believed to be a rich source of materials from
which propellants can be made. Large regions of the Martian surface have
been identified from orbit as containing more than 60 percent water by
weight. Such water, now in frozen mud, could be accessed and electrolyzed
to produce both oxygen and hydrogen rocket propellants. Hydrogen so obtained
could also be reacted with the carbon dioxide that makes up the Martian
atmosphere to produce methane and oxygen to fuel a rocket, or alternatively,
methanol and oxygen for a fuel cell.
 |
| Getting around: Members of the
Mars Society's trial-run experiment on Devon Island put all-terrain
vehicles to a practical test. Their experiences will influence the
development of equipment that astronauts will use. |
Methane or methanol and oxygen can also be produced on Mars by reacting
local CO2 with hydrogen (which constitutes 5 percent of the propellant
mass) transported from Earth. Martian soil contains virtually every element
known on Earth, and many materials have been concentrated into ore by
the planet's complex hydrological and volcanic history, making
use of mineral resources feasible, too.
In the longer term, the inhabitants of a permanent planetary base may
not only make their propellants, but other life support consumables, such
as air, water, and food, out of local resources. In this respect, Mars
is much more promising than the moon for long-term occupation. Carbon
dioxide, nitrogen, and water required for plant growth are plentiful on
the Red Planet's surface, but extremely rare in the lunar environment.
The rich carbon supply on Mars also suggests a possibility of local production
of such essentials as plastics, lubricants, and synthetic fabrics. The
Martian regolith can also be used as a shielding material for habitats.
For the coming age of space exploration, Mars compares to the moon as
North America compared to Greenland during the era of European maritime
exploration. We will reach the moon first, but Mars has the promise of
a place where we can settle.
|
Making Space Safe for Humans
The challenges of time, distance,
and hostile environment necessitate special demands to protect and
support a crew on a mission to Mars.
Space vehicle launch, docking, navigation, and landing will require
complex interactions between automated systems and human operators.
NASA is developing technologies to improve the reliability of automated
rendezvous and docking systems for in-space vehicles. It is working
on intelligent software agents that can help the crew in performing
fault detection and repairs.
Physical tasks on the Martian surface will require protective suits
that allow explorers to function effectively without the risk of
excessive fatigue. Mars travelers may be subjected to long periods
of microgravity during interplanetary travel and to an extended
period of reduced gravitation on the surface of Mars. The acceleration
of Mars, roughly 3.7 meters per second, is about one-third that
of Earth.
Travelers will face psychological and physical challenges induced
by the long-term confinement of the voyage. They will also need
protection from changing levels and various types of radiation in
the environment.
Prolonged exposure to reduced gravity, confinement, and, of course,
radiation pose risks to human health and performance. NASA is working
to develop smart, integrated medical systems to assist in delivering
quality health care to space travelers. These systems include minimally
invasive and noninvasive methods of gathering health data, automated
devices to aid in diagnosis, and even surgical techniques for use
in space.
|
|
Robotic Pioneering
Robotic exploration of Mars has been
an important part of the space exploration missions of the United
States, Russia, Europe, and Japan. Between 1960 and 2005, a total
of 40 orbiters, landers, and rovers have been launched toward Mars
to gather data about the planet. The U.S. alone has sent 19 robotic
missions to Mars, of which 14three fly-bys, six orbiters,
three stationary landers, and two rovershave been successful.
As a result of this activity, a great deal of advanced data has
been obtained about Mars, and it is unclear how much more is truly
necessary before a human Mars mission can be attempted. In particular,
the recently arrived NASA Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter will soon
be mapping the planet with photographic resolutions better than
20 cm per pixel, which will allow us to see objects as small as
60 cm across. This is more than adequate to identify the landing
hazards of interest to a human landing craft. It is also sufficient
to create, in advance, the kind of maps that human explorers might
need.
Current and future robotic missions can complement human exploration.
Robots can enhance knowledge about the Martian environment, scout
landing sites, deliver elements of infrastructure, assess resources,
test and validate new technologies, and alert the crew to impending
failures or dangers. If human explorers will need to drill to find
ground water, orbiters could be sent ahead with powerful ground
penetrating radar. (There is already some GPR on both the European
Mars Express and the Reconnaissance Orbiter, but in neither case
is it the primary instrument.) A robotic sample-return mission to
likely landing sites could provide detailed information before a
human landing, and test the operational aspects of a round trip.
|
|
Down to Earth Practice
The success of a human mission to
Mars will require that crews be trained to solve problems that can
occur. It is to identify those potential problems that a number
of Mars analog experiments and simulation studies have been conducted
by NASA, the Mars Society, and other organizations. These studies,
which address some of the human factors of Mars exploration, started
with short-term simulations and are moving toward simulating full-term
Mars missions.
The terrestrial analogs for Mars are setting on Earth where some
of the environmental conditions, geological features, and biological
attributes are reminiscent of those to be encountered on Mars. The
environments offer opportunities for partial simulations of Martian
conditions.
The Mars Society has built two analog Mars stations, one in the
desert in southern Utah, and the other on Canada's Devon
Island in the high Arctic. Since 2001, some 60 crews of six people
each have conducted simulated Mars exploration missions at these
stations. For two to four weeks at a time, these crews attempt to
conduct a sustained program of field exploration while operating
under some of the same constraints that will be faced by explorers
on an actual human Mars mission.
For example, no one is allowed to go outside without wearing a spacesuit
simulator. The crew is responsible for all of its own field work,
lab work, reportage, repair of equipment, and chores of daily life.
They work in telescience collaboration with a remote science team,
a mission support group, and an engineering team located in the
continental United States. Conducting operations in this way yields
many insights into technologies, techniques, field exploration tactics,
crew skills, character types, and operational procedures that will
be most useful in carrying out actual expeditions to the Red Planet.
The Mars Society plans to send a single crew in 2007 to conduct
a four-month simulated Mars mission on Devon Island, 900 miles from
the North Pole. An open call for crew volunteers has been posted
on the Mars Society's Web site, www.marssociety.org.
The Institute of Biomedical Problems of the Russian Academy of Science
is preparing a ground-based experiment that will confine six volunteers
for more than 500 days, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2007,
with the overall goal of identifying the needed biomedical support
for a human Mars mission.
The experiment will be conducted in a complex of five modules, with
a total volume of 550 cubic meters. The modules contain individual
cabins for the crew and working quarters for carrying out biomedical
research. During the experiment, the crew will be subjected to stress
and various emergencies, including malfunctioning of equipment and
systems.
|
|
For More Information
Readers interested in pursuing the
subject covered
in this article will find directions to more information at http://www.aee.odu.edu/humanmarsportal.
The Web site, created as a companion to Mechanical
Engineering magazine's November Feature Focus, contains links
to material on human Mars mission strategies, robotic Mars missions,
and a media gallery. There are also links to other online services
and features of the Center for Advanced
Engineering Environments at Old Dominion University.
Further information about the Mars Society and its activities can
be found at www.marssociety.org.
|
Ahmed K. Noor is eminent scholar and William E.
Lobeck Professor of Aerospace Engineering and the director of the Center
for Advanced Engineering Environments at Old Dominion University in Norfolk,
Va. He is also adjunct professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering
at the University of Florida in Gainesville.
Robert Zubrin is president of Pioneer Astronautics, an aerospace engineering
R&D firm. He is also president of the Mars Society, an international
nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting Mars Exploration.
Douglas Stanley is a visiting professor in the Department of Aerospace
Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. He works at the National
Institute of Aerospace in Hampton, Va.
home
| features | breaking
news | marketplace
| departments | about
ME back issues | ASME
| site search
© 2006 by The American Society
of Mechanical Engineers
|