By
John G. Falcioni,
Editor-in-Chief |
They say
that enterprise resource planning systems integrate all data and processes
of an organization into a unified whole. The system keeps all the important
information about a business where planners and decision-makers can find
it.
Sounds pretty good, all right, but I've thought that's what
file drawers and dividers are for. Surprisingly, many managers still think
so as well.
Even as the proliferation of ERP systems is reaching beyond large companies
to small and midsize ones, some managers are reluctant to take the plunge
because they believe ERP systems are either too expensive to set up or
too difficult to use. Others are simply concerned about undertaking a
new venture that threatens to change internal processes that their employees
have become accustomed tono matter what gains a successful ERP
system promises to deliver.
Of course, the term "ERP" has come to mean different things
to different people. A data mining project may be called ERP, as might
a software program that performs accounting and payroll functions. Essentially,
any unified database system that serves various company systems is referred
to by the snappy initials.
Manufacturers were the first to implement ERP systems, since they needed
a way to tie design software tools with other data to pull together a
successful enterprise. It has now spread to disparate industries and multiple
uses, from control of inventory, processes, and workflow to other infrastructure-management
functions.
Industry analysts say that a new service-oriented architecture may attract
more converts to ERP. Associate editor Jean Thilmany reports on that in
her article, "Crystal Ball for Business," which begins on
page 36. The architecture is bridge software that may let companies avoid
some of the head- aches of implementing an entirely new business system
and at the same time let them recoup the benefits of ERP.
At Johns Hopkins University Hospital in Baltimore there is an emphasis
on control, too. Researchers there are interested not only in controlling
data, but also in controlling the smooth motion of robotic arms during
surgery.
Associate editor Jeffrey Winters writes that "for many tasks in
sensitive parts of the body, the human touch may be too clumsy"
and is giving way to robots.
But don't fret; the experience of a surgeon continues to play a
big role even in robotic surgery. It's not likely we'll
be subjected to the whims of an R2D2-type robot in the operating room
any time soon.
Congratulations to Robert E. Nickella past president of ASME and
a member of the Mechanical Engineering Magazine Advisory Board.
Last month, Nickell was named to the prestigious National Academy of Engineering.
He is one of 64 new members, who bring the total NAE membership to a select
2,217 engineers in the United States. There are also 188 foreign associates,
nine of whom are newly elected.
According to the academy, membership recognizes those who have made outstanding
contributions to engineering research, practice, or education. Members
have been cited for significant contributions to engineering literature,
for pioneering work in developing fields of technology, for advancements
in traditional fields of engineering, and for innovative approaches to
the teaching of engineering.
Nickell, the president of Applied Science & Technology in San Diego,
was elected in recognition of his contributions to both the finite element
method and the safe operation of power plants.
home
| features | breaking
news | marketplace
| departments | about
ME back issues | ASME
| site search
© 2007 by The American Society
of Mechanical Engineers
|